SS Splash bar in wet cooling tower Company - Suony Fibre Glass India pvt ltd

Comparison between Various Materials of Construction for Cooling Towers

Cooling towers can be made from a large variety of materials of construction. A small comparison between Concrete, FRP and timber highlights the difference between them and their relative advantages and disadvantages:

Timber
Quality: Available Timber of Low Grade
Cost of installation and Running: Low Installation Cost and High Running Cost
O & M: High
Length of Members: small
Bio decay by fungus: Decay due to fungus, Algae and bacteria
Repair & Replacement: Very frequent
Life: 5 years
Environment Impact: Wood logging and treatment of wood plays havoc with environment
Enquiry

FRP(with PVC fills)
Quality:Consistent and High Quality
Cost of installation and Running: Slightly high installation but low running cost
O & M:Low, but requires periodic replacement of fills.
Length of Members: Large , can be made larger
Bio decay by fungus: No such decay
Repair & Replacement: Very less
Life: 15-20 years
Environment Impact: No such impact
Enquiry

RCC
Quality: Depends on specification
Cost of installation and Running: High cost for small tower
O & M: Low but high for corrosive environment
Length of Members: As per design
Bio decay by fungus: Algae formation
Repair & Replacement: Very less
Life: 20 years
Environment Impact: No such impact
Enquiry

FRP(perforated SS Splash bar type)
Made by only Suony Fibre Glass
Quality:Consistent and High Quality
Cost of installation and Running: Slightly high installation but very low running cost
O & M: Very low, No Such fills replacement required.
Length of Members: Large , can be made larger
Bio decay by fungus: No such decay
Repair & Replacement: Very less
Life: More than 25 years
Environment Impact: No such impact
Enquiry

COMPARISON BETWEEN YOUR EXISTING (CONVENTIONAL) & SS SPLASH BAR TYPE COOLING TOWER:

SS splash bar cooling tower do not require periodic replacement of PVC fills.
SS splash bar cooling tower do not require periodic replacement of nozzles as it does not have it.
The maintenance cost for the tower is very low as there is no replacement of fills & nozzles and therefore no company personnel is required at your site for maintenance.
Your existing cooling tower has nasty & complicated maintenance whereas SS splash bar type has clean, easy & user friendly maintenance.
SS splash bar cooling tower gives performance consistently for much larger time than later.
It is more efficient than your existing cooling tower & gives better performance due to better heat exchanging.
Can work at temperatures up to 100⁰c.
SS splash bar cooling tower can work even with untreated hard water without drop in performance.
Last but not the list SS splash bar has maximum life expectancy of more than 25 years where as your existing cooling tower has life expectancy of 20 years.